Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video76.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meadows results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Quote-first Misdirection, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 76.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (26,090 of 44,299 speakers). This Meadows is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Meadows
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠42%Meadows (selected)25%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 76.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
24.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos76.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.6%20.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 0.0%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos