Author summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach Urness results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 1,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,366 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (3,797 of 8,276 authors). This Zach Urness is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Zach Urness
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Jared Counts1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠55%Zach Urness (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,366
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Zach Urness attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Zach Urness vs sitewide
Zach Urness attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos