Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video37.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Katz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 109.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,473 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthew Katz is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Matthew Katz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠53%Matthew Katz (selected)34%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos