Speaker summary
67%1 analyzed article/video57.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maryann Karlen results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 164.014 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.8% and a BS Rank of 74% (11,838 of 45,145 speakers). This Maryann Karlen is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Maryann Karlen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
74%Maryann Karlen (selected)52%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 57.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
51.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 62.1%62.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 37.9%37.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 62.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos