Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Grace Carson results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 47.8% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (28,353 of 45,122 speakers). This Mary Grace Carson is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Mary Grace Carson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠38%Mary Grace Carson (selected)22%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
21.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos