Speaker summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 413.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Rembacz results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 116 hits . Analysis detected 673.123 faulty-reasoning hits from 413.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (41,787 of 45,132 speakers). This Mark Rembacz is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Mark Rembacz
Speaker details
Total words: 413.333
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 7.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos413.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst