Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Goins results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ad Hominem, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 31 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (3,451 of 39,518 speakers). This Mark Goins is worse (more manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Mark Goins
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠92%Mark Goins (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510091.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos