Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kat Stansell results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 2,360 hits. Analysis detected 11,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,502 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,011 authors). This Kat Stansell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Kat Stansell
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kat Stansell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kat Stansell vs sitewide
Kat Stansell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.