Speaker summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Baez (Coahuiltecan Tribe) results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 66 hits . Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 229 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (34,059 of 39,216 speakers). This Mark Baez (Coahuiltecan Tribe) is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Mark Baez (Coahuiltecan Tribe)
Speaker details
Total words: 229
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 10.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos229 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 28.8% 28.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Tu Quoque: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst