Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elyse Wild results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 366 hits . Analysis detected 2,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (4,851 of 8,522 authors). This Elyse Wild is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Elyse Wild
Author details
Total words: 3,980
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst