Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lonijoli Fox results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 193 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (41,998 of 45,057 speakers). This Lonijoli Fox is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Lonijoli Fox
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠7%Lonijoli Fox (selected)8%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 193
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos193 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos