Speaker summary
61%1 analyzed article/video188.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Gonzalez results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 64.057 hits. Analysis detected 324.057 faulty-reasoning hits from 188.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (36,283 of 43,695 speakers). This Liz Gonzalez is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Liz Gonzalez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
17%Liz Gonzalez (selected)12%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 188.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
11.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos188.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos