Speaker summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Krish O'Mara Vignarajah results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.9% saturation with 155.431 hits. Analysis detected 441.996 faulty-reasoning hits from 206 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (27,321 of 45,123 speakers). This Krish O'Mara Vignarajah is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Krish O'Mara Vignarajah
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠40%Krish O'Mara Vignarajah (selected)24%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 206
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.5% percentile
23.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos206 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.9%65.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.8%17.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos