Speaker summary
88%1 analyzed article/video104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Klamath County Sheriff Shane L. results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Loss Aversion, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.4% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (22,454 of 44,676 speakers). This Klamath County Sheriff Shane L. is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Klamath County Sheriff Shane L.
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
50%Klamath County Sheriff Shane L. (selected)30%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
29.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos104 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.4%65.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 21.1%21.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos