Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kiprop results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 79.5% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 59.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (10,368 of 45,145 speakers). This Kiprop is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Kiprop
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠77%Kiprop (selected)60%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.0% percentile
59.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 79.5%79.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 79.5%79.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.5%20.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Begging the Question: Speaker 79.5%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 79.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos