Speaker summary
80%1 analyzed article/video386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keisha Jordan results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 42.7% saturation with 164.691 hits. Analysis detected 689.099 faulty-reasoning hits from 386 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,136 of 28,364 speakers). This Keisha Jordan is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Keisha Jordan
Speaker details