Speaker summary
ā 39%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Bowsher results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 243 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.8% and a BS Rank of ā 56% (12,728 of 28,364 speakers). This Julia Bowsher is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Julia Bowsher
Speaker details