Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video107.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Braxton results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 92.4% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 376.15 faulty-reasoning hits from 107.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,614 of 28,364 speakers). This Jordan Braxton is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Jordan Braxton
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠52%Jordan Braxton (selected)34%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 107.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos