Speaker summary
49%1 analyzed article/video133.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Terfurth results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 58.5 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 133.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of 36% (12,430 of 19,334 speakers). This Jonathan Terfurth is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Jonathan Terfurth
Speaker details