Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Federman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Burden of Proof, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,678 of 37,317 speakers). This John Federman is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
John Federman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠93%John Federman (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos