Speaker summary
76%1 analyzed article/video54.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Cremins results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 251.582 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (11,417 of 29,103 speakers). This John Cremins is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
John Cremins
Speaker details