Speaker summary
ā 94%1 analyzed article/video124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Johan Galtung results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 208 faulty-reasoning hits from 124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.9% and a BS Rank of ā 74% (7,559 of 28,364 speakers). This Johan Galtung is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Johan Galtung
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 74%Johan Galtung (selected)56%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 124
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos