Speaker summary
78%2 analyzed articles/videos393.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joey Jones results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 1,316.727 faulty-reasoning hits from 393.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (40,222 of 45,122 speakers). This Joey Jones is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Joey Jones
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
11%Joey Jones (selected)10%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 393.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
9.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos393.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 16.3%16.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos