Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Auriemma results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 264 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,678 of 37,459 speakers). This Joe Auriemma is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Joe Auriemma
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠93%Joe Auriemma (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos