Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video45.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Stearns results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 140.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (7,915 of 44,411 speakers). This Jim Stearns is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Jim Stearns
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠83%Jim Stearns (selected)75%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos