Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Martin results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Confirmation Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (13,261 of 44,363 speakers). This Jim Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Jim Martin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠71%Jim Martin (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos