Author summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Dario results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 891 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (854 of 8,290 authors). This Kate Dario is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Kate Dario
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠90%Kate Dario (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kate Dario attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kate Dario vs sitewide
Kate Dario attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos