Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video130.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Currier results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 130.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (31,017 of 45,112 speakers). This Jim Currier is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Jim Currier
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠32%Jim Currier (selected)19%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 130.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
18.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos130.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 3.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos