Speaker summary
41%1 analyzed article/video69.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Switzer results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Overconfidence Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 35 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (16,926 of 42,528 speakers). This Jeff Switzer is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Jeff Switzer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
61%Jeff Switzer (selected)40%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 69.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
39.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos69.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 39.8%39.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos