Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video110.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Hohl results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 119 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (23,853 of 44,410 speakers). This Jason Hohl is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Jason Hohl
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠47%Jason Hohl (selected)28%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 110.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
27.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos110.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.4%11.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos