Speaker summary
75%2 analyzed articles/videos107.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Cox results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 66.6% saturation with 77.564 hits. Analysis detected 196.038 faulty-reasoning hits from 107.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of 49% (20,077 of 38,739 speakers). This Jason Cox is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Jason Cox
Speaker details