Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video60.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasmin Imran Alsous results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 60.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,693 of 39,281 speakers). This Jasmin Imran Alsous is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Jasmin Imran Alsous
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠94%Jasmin Imran Alsous (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 60.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos