Speaker summary
80%1 analyzed article/video101.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janet Ruiz results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 69.7% saturation with 67.919 hits. Analysis detected 308.919 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (26,516 of 45,123 speakers). This Janet Ruiz is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Janet Ruiz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
42%Janet Ruiz (selected)25%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 101.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.2% percentile
24.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos101.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 69.7%69.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 48.6%48.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 28.4%28.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 69.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos