Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Patton results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 50 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,665 of 39,003 speakers). This Jane Patton is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Jane Patton
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠94%Jane Patton (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos