Author summary
26%1 analyzed article/video2,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ames Alexander/Floodlight results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,456 hits. Analysis detected 5,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (6,339 of 6,744 authors). This Ames Alexander/Floodlight is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Ames Alexander/Floodlight
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ames Alexander/Floodlight attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ames Alexander/Floodlight vs sitewide
Ames Alexander/Floodlight attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.