Speaker summary
86%1 analyzed article/video173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J. Michael Dahm results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Circular Reasoning, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 47.734 hits. Analysis detected 298.599 faulty-reasoning hits from 173 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (32,584 of 44,327 speakers). This J. Michael Dahm is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
J. Michael Dahm
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
27%J. Michael Dahm (selected)17%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 173
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.5% percentile
16.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos173 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos