Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indivisible Mesa results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 15 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,395 of 38,009 speakers). This Indivisible Mesa is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Indivisible Mesa
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠94%Indivisible Mesa (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 15
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos