Speaker summary
69%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ICGF officials results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,348 of 37,937 speakers). This ICGF officials is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group.
ICGF officials
Speaker details