Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helena Foulkes results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 52 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (11,924 of 40,165 speakers). This Helena Foulkes is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Helena Foulkes
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠71%Helena Foulkes (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos