Author summary
72%1 analyzed article/video243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Anderson results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (855 of 8,275 authors). This Patrick Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Patrick Anderson
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Patrick Anderson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Patrick Anderson vs sitewide
Patrick Anderson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.