Speaker summary
51%2 analyzed articles/videos139.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harvard University results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 166.03 faulty-reasoning hits from 139.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (16,711 of 28,364 speakers). This Harvard University is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Harvard University
Speaker details