Author summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video1,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Eggers results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 2,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (2,262 of 5,308 authors). This Caroline Eggers is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Caroline Eggers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠58%Caroline Eggers (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Caroline Eggers attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Caroline Eggers vs sitewide
Caroline Eggers attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos