Speaker summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos807.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanover Matz results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 1,036.642 faulty-reasoning hits from 807.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (41,234 of 45,123 speakers). This Hanover Matz is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Hanover Matz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠9%Hanover Matz (selected)9%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 807.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.6% percentile
8.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos807.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos