Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gordon Appleman results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Primacy Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 422 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (34,420 of 45,128 speakers). This Gordon Appleman is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Gordon Appleman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠24%Gordon Appleman (selected)15%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 422
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
14.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos422 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos