Author summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The FWR Staff results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 207 hits . Analysis detected 876 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,762 of 9,471 authors). This The FWR Staff is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. The FWR Staff
Author details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst