Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Hendricks results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 61 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,178 of 28,364 speakers). This George Hendricks is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
George Hendricks
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠61%George Hendricks (selected)44%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos