Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Lloyd Wright results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,839 of 35,868 speakers). This Frank Lloyd Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Frank Lloyd Wright
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠95%Frank Lloyd Wright (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos