Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Natalie Hoberman results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 1,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,677 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 5,316 authors). This Natalie Hoberman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Natalie Hoberman
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalie Hoberman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalie Hoberman vs sitewide
Natalie Hoberman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.