Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forest Ecology and Management results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,938 of 39,422 speakers). This Forest Ecology and Management is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Forest Ecology and Management
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠96%Forest Ecology and Management (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos