Speaker summary
43%53 analyzed articles/videos1,492.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food and Drug Administration results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 319.541 hits. Analysis detected 2,851.256 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,492.333 analyzed words across 53 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,728 of 27,015 speakers). This Food and Drug Administration is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Food and Drug Administration
Speaker details
Total words: 1,492.333
Article count: 53
Authors